Skip to main content

TV: Where stories go to die

Last evening I decided to watch the opening episode of a newly conceived show, "Person of Interest." I was enticed by ads featuring lead actor Jim Caviezel (or something like that), who is really good-looking, and he has a tremendous presence. No wonder he played Jesus Christ in a movie! But the show, as it rolls out, is making a mockery of the American brain.

The premise of the story isn't bad. A rich man creates watchdog software for American intelligence services, then realizes he must create a "back door" to the program. He preserves for himself the ability to view potential problems that don't come to government attention and resolve them; he finds Caviezel, a former intelligence agent, and gets him involved in the dirty work. The problem is that most of the story is not told in words, but in strange screen views of the cameras that watch all of America.

This show is a great example of how the "geeks" of TV creativity are moving away from stories that really explore human experience and interaction (both good and bad) and translate it to immediate, head-popping visuals. if you can't absorb and translate visuals as fast as kid watching cartoons, then you are out of luck. The speed with which the digital images pass is certainly a boon for advertisers; instead of 8 minutes of advertising, a 30-minute show can get nine or ten minutes crammed in.

When a show begins to gloss over its story in favor of visuals, and when it starts pushing me to follow screens that move ever faster, I am exasperated. I know that at some point I will give up, throw up my hands, and get rid of the monster in the room. I can watch hulu plus on my laptop, choose what I please, and ignore TV (ADVERTISERS: DO YOU READ ME LOUD AND CLEAR?)

Does anyone wonder why DVD sets of old sitcoms sell so well? Wonder no more.

Mrs. B



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wanted: 850 new FBI agents

My dream job is finally available. FBI, here I come! When I logged on to CNN today and found that the FBI is hiring, ( cnn.com/2009/CRIME/01/05/fbi.hiring.binge/index.html ) my heart tripped the tango. I've always wanted to follow in the steps of one of my literary heroes, Mrs. Pollifax, the delightful grandmotherly woman who gets assignments that take her all over the world as a courier and spy. Ooops. Wait, it's the CIA that sends people all over the world. The FBI handles problems in the U.S. Okay, I can still live with that. Apparently this is the largest job posting for FBI agents since 2001, and it includes openings for more than 2,000 support personnel as well. I wonder if the FBI is trying to hire some of the financial folks and automakers who got pink-slipped at the end of 2008? Or is bail-out money going to the FBI? When most employers--including state governments--are letting people go, where does the FBI get money for new hires? The lengthy list of openings includes...

What's Next for 2009: Predictions and Educated Guesses

There's an old saying that the year will go the way the stock market goes for the first week of January. I hope that's true, because today's market went above 9,000 for the first time since November. Any ray of sunshine helps! I was delighted to say goodbye to 2008, which was a tough year all the way around. While I dealt with the death of friends and family and a job change, many Americans faced mortgage foreclosures, job losses, and economic failure. I count myself lucky to be employed, and I am especially looking forward to my first grandchild in 2009. So other than a grandchild, what do I think 2009 will bring? Here are my predictions and educated guesses: 1. Barack Obama will show us that he has more good sense, common sense, and downright intelligence than any president since Franklin Roosevelt. He has already demonstrated this by choosing cabinet-level staff that are experienced and educated in their areas and willing to work together. With a "can do" staff...

A book that makes me think

Every once in a while I read a book that I'd like to put on a reading list for every American. This time it's Susan Jacoby's The Age of American Unreason. It's clear from Jacoby's writing and her content that she is an American intellectual of the highest order. To get the full meaning of her prose, I found myself re-reading paragraphs, asking myself if I agree with her ideas, reviewing the framework she uses to make her points, and looking at her bibliography to assess her sources. From her bibliography, I've found at least three more books I want to read. What is her point? Jacoby believes that America has settled into an age of anti-rationalism and anti-intellectualism, as evidenced by the huge numbers of Americans who do not know--or never learned--the basics of science, the primary events of American history, and critical reading skills. Her point is that Americans believe what they are told without giving thought to who is speaking or writing, and that we ...