Skip to main content

 The Fourth Estate: A Modern Obituary

If you’ve lived for many decades, you’ve heard your peers bemoaning the unwelcome changes we see in American life: increased traffic, the diversity in crowds, the urban noise, the ever-changing rules and regulations by which we must live. Thomas Friedman, author of an important new book, Thank You for Being Late, addresses some of these concerns resulting from our changing technology. I’d like to address one of my own journalistic concerns resulting from changing technology: the death of the Fourth Estate. Consider this a death notice.

What is the Fourth Estate? It’s a term devised in Europe in the 16th century to describe those who wrote the news. Not the dailies and weeklies we know today, but the writers who unveiled the activities of leaders, both royal and elected, and kept the tax-paying public aware of governments’ activities. In Europe, the church was the first estate, nobility the second estate, commoners the third estate. Following the invention of the printing press in 1462, the fourth estate slowly developed into the written resources commoners used to keep abreast of local, and eventually national happenings.

During the birth of America, one-page broadsheets were vital in bringing the early colonies together to place their demand: no taxation without representation. News of the colonists’ demand for freedom from England, the call for settlers to serve in the army, the derision of King George were all part of our revolution and the early growth of America’s fourth estate.

As America grew, the fourth estate was comprised of professional journalists who were educated to write clear, accurate, and truthful news for publication; colleges and universities educated reporters and writers according to the standards set by professional journalists’ organizations. Newspapers published in the twentieth century held responsibility for sharing true, accurate, and important news of the day—for example, Watergate. When national television came along, the same was true for news shared on television.

Unfortunately, today’s America has lost its fourth estate. Its death occurred very shortly after the first “citizen journalist” hit the internet.

The rise of the internet has not eliminated newspapers. You can still read your local and national newspapers online—for a price, of course. In fact, there are probably many more sources of information on the internet than used to be printed. The question is, who wrote that information? Is it accurate? Is it well-written and without grammatical errors? Was it reviewed by anyone? More importantly, is it true?

Once the internet entered our schools and homes and workplaces, and as we learned to use it for communicating, American ingenuity brought us the concept of “social media.” Now we can share our ideas in real time with our friends around the nation and around the world, using applications like Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, and other platforms that collect our social media addresses and send us algorithmic ads. Sometimes we just use e-mail, but everyone is more likely to read what you wrote if it has an eye-catching visual attached, and eye-catching visuals are found all over the internet (cat meme, anyone?).

So instead of media being the esteemed fourth estate with an educated cohort sharing well-researched news of the day, we have a totally new entity: the citizen journalist. The citizen journalist—who may be not much of a citizen or a journalist—is able to share ideas—true or not—with online cohorts around the world. This citizen journalist is no longer sharing complaints with the neighbors, he or she is sharing them with the world. Remember, for example, Alex Jones, who loudly proclaimed on radio, TV, and internet that the FBI had staged the 2016 Sandy Hook tragedy, and that the deaths of 26 elementary students and teachers did not occur. He was able to convince a large portion of his online readers to believe this conspiracy theory, and it took a decade to get him charged, adjudicated, and punished for the lies that he created, the pain he caused, and the ignorance he shared with the world.

Not everyone is an Alex Jones. Some internet users are misinformed, mistaken, or unaware. Some internet users are mentally ill, some are misled, some are greedy to sell ads along with their false information. For whatever reason, we need to remember that the internet’s “citizen journalists” are not always reliable. It’s even clear from recent national elections that other nations will post false information on the internet to interfere with our political processes. 

What will the Fourth Estate become? It won't go away, now that everyone knows how to share an opinion, right or wrong. Perhaps it will fade into "who cares?" by the end of this century. Perhaps it will lead to an even greater divide of citizens in the United States, with our culture becoming further split on lies and truth, right and wrong, values and ethics. 

I hope we will continue to ask the important questions: who can I help? who is my leader and why? am I meant to be a leader? how can I make this world a better place?


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wanted: 850 new FBI agents

My dream job is finally available. FBI, here I come! When I logged on to CNN today and found that the FBI is hiring, ( cnn.com/2009/CRIME/01/05/fbi.hiring.binge/index.html ) my heart tripped the tango. I've always wanted to follow in the steps of one of my literary heroes, Mrs. Pollifax, the delightful grandmotherly woman who gets assignments that take her all over the world as a courier and spy. Ooops. Wait, it's the CIA that sends people all over the world. The FBI handles problems in the U.S. Okay, I can still live with that. Apparently this is the largest job posting for FBI agents since 2001, and it includes openings for more than 2,000 support personnel as well. I wonder if the FBI is trying to hire some of the financial folks and automakers who got pink-slipped at the end of 2008? Or is bail-out money going to the FBI? When most employers--including state governments--are letting people go, where does the FBI get money for new hires? The lengthy list of openings includes...

What's Next for 2009: Predictions and Educated Guesses

There's an old saying that the year will go the way the stock market goes for the first week of January. I hope that's true, because today's market went above 9,000 for the first time since November. Any ray of sunshine helps! I was delighted to say goodbye to 2008, which was a tough year all the way around. While I dealt with the death of friends and family and a job change, many Americans faced mortgage foreclosures, job losses, and economic failure. I count myself lucky to be employed, and I am especially looking forward to my first grandchild in 2009. So other than a grandchild, what do I think 2009 will bring? Here are my predictions and educated guesses: 1. Barack Obama will show us that he has more good sense, common sense, and downright intelligence than any president since Franklin Roosevelt. He has already demonstrated this by choosing cabinet-level staff that are experienced and educated in their areas and willing to work together. With a "can do" staff...

A book that makes me think

Every once in a while I read a book that I'd like to put on a reading list for every American. This time it's Susan Jacoby's The Age of American Unreason. It's clear from Jacoby's writing and her content that she is an American intellectual of the highest order. To get the full meaning of her prose, I found myself re-reading paragraphs, asking myself if I agree with her ideas, reviewing the framework she uses to make her points, and looking at her bibliography to assess her sources. From her bibliography, I've found at least three more books I want to read. What is her point? Jacoby believes that America has settled into an age of anti-rationalism and anti-intellectualism, as evidenced by the huge numbers of Americans who do not know--or never learned--the basics of science, the primary events of American history, and critical reading skills. Her point is that Americans believe what they are told without giving thought to who is speaking or writing, and that we ...